以下是鄭和文校長有關反核廢進駐台東第4篇
希望大家幫幫忙轉寄或者轉載
各位夥伴
不好意思
又是反核廢
一定有人看了會說
那放那裡好呢
我們又必需重申
這是沒道理也沒道德的事
問題的製造者以聖者或旁觀者自居
振振有辭的返身要求最晚有電最少用電的受害者解決他們製造的問題
怪哉怪哉
hanwen
Part4
或許 我們以為
矇上眼睛 就以為看不見
摀上耳朵 就以為聽不到
如今
即便你睜開雙眸 你也看不見
即便你側耳傾聽 你也聽不到
只因為
事實已經被矇蔽
黑矸子裝了什麼醬油已不可辨
只因為
黑暗中的幽靈過度現身
讓我們看不見核廢的鬼魅
現在
我們在「臉」與「險」中徬徨
我們在「崇」與「祟」中失足
不敢露臉的險 讓扛起十字架成為無臉下的犧牲
然而
戴上假面的臉 以不顧別人的險讓惡靈得以猖狂
我們的立場已經置換
高傲的無臉者 不停的想止住風險
恣意的在「空中的夢想家」高聲呼嘯
不再自傲的崇 讓受害的祖靈成了作祟下的游魂
然而
刻意包裝的祟 以利益的恩寵讓受害者獲得庇佑
我們的祖靈已經易位
至高的尊崇者 不住的以黑巫行祟
肆意的在「失去的伊甸園」昂首闊步
附記：
核廢料最終處置是為防止核廢料對環境和人類造成危害，故必須將其與生物圈有效地隔離。最終處置的主要對像是高放核廢料。核廢料是核物質在核反應爐（原子爐）內燃燒後餘留下來的核灰燼，具有極強烈的放射性，而且其半衰期長達數千年、數萬年甚至幾十萬年。也就是說，在幾十萬年後，這些核廢料還能傷害人類和環境。(資料引自http://baike.baidu.com/view/136615.htm)
2009/6/15時報週刊記者陳宛妤以〈直入核電廠 解析低放射性廢棄物〉為題，為台電專家的引述作嫁，認為抗議者把核廢妖魔化，並以科普的角度將自稱為愛台東的無知者訓斥一番，而且倡言「全世界的核廢最終處置場，至今未出現安全性的問題。」[1]
如果可以的話請聯結下面的網站。看一看歷史上著名的諾曼第登陸和核廢料發生了什麼關係。
http://e-info.org.tw/node/8751
Normandy Aquifer Seven Times More Radioactive Than French Limit
諾曼地核廢滲漏 地下水輻射值超標7倍
PARIS, France, May 29, 2006 (ENS) - Radioactive tritium from a nuclear waste storage facility in Normandy , France is leaking into groundwater that is being used by local farmers for their dairy cattle, according to a new report published by the French laboratory ACRO. 最新檢測報告指出：核廢的氚輻射滲入地下水殘留在當地酪農
"Because of its mismanagement, CSM is causing damage to the environment," said ACRO Director Dr. David Boiley. "Repeated incidents have led to a constant release, and as a consequence the ground water and many outlets are highly contaminated with tritium."
地下水和許多出水口都有高污染的「氚」
Tritium contamination is regarded by the French Radioactive Waste Agency as a good tracer for anticipating future contamination from other radionuclides in the dumpsite. These include strontium, cesium and plutonium, all cancer causing radionuclides.
預期的未來氚將和鍶、銫、鈽被認定為需要好好追蹤，一起納入會引起癌症的放射性核種。
The Centre Stockage de la Manche (CSM), France 's first low-level nuclear waste storage facility. (Photo courtesy CEA)
Located on the western tip of the Cotentin Peninsula in Normandy , the Areva NC La Hague site reprocesses spent nuclear power reactor fuel into reusable uranium and plutonium.
ACRO found that levels of radioactivity in the aquifer are on average 750 Bequerels per liter (Bq/l), - more than seven times the legal European safety limit of 100 Bq/l.
In agricultural land close to the dumpsite, ACRO tests found levels in the underground aquifer during 2005 averaged 9000 Bq/l - 90 times above the safety limit.
地下水的污染超出90倍的安全值。
"We must note that for a long time there has been a lack of information regarding this chronic pollution, and even now a precise assessment of its impacts still needs to be done," Boiley said.
"As far as the future situation," he warned, "it could worsen in the long run because there is no guarantee that the wrappings of the older wastes, which also contain more hazardous elements, will last for long periods of time. When a new contamination is detected it will be too late."
就未來的情形而言，長久下來情況會越來越糟，因為目前無法保證用來儲存舊廢料的封存設備能夠撐多久，況且其中還封存了更多危險物質，等到偵測到新污染時，一切都太遲了。
Scientists from the ACRO lab, together with Greenpeace, have been conducting a survey of radioactive contamination leaking from the nuclear waste disposal facility at la Hague.
"More than 30 years ago the French public were assured that selection of the CSM dumpsite was based upon extensive assessments of the geology and hydrology, and that there was no risk of contamination," said Shaun Burnie Greenpeace nuclear campaigner.
30多年前法國民眾認為基於地質和水文的廣泛評估下，CSM這個場址是沒有污染的風險。
"In reality," he said, "levels have reached thousands of times the natural background level."
說真的，輻射值高達自然值的1000倍
Between 1967 and 1994 over 1.4 million containers, with a volume of 527,000 cubic meters of waste, were dumped at the CSM in trenches and purpose built vaults. The largest volume of waste disposed of at the CSM was produced by EdF, which operates 58 nuclear reactors.
In its report ACRO says the inventory of the wastes at CSM "is not precisely known," but the laboratory is able to identify 100 kilograms of plutonium, "as well as many other alpha emitting elements particularly toxic in case of contamination."
許多有毒的物質仍然未被精確的知道
In addition, there are chemical toxics which will not disappear with time, including almost 20 tons of lead and one ton of mercury, ACRO reports.
另外，有些化學毒物並沒有隨著時間而消失，包括20噸的鉛和1噸的汞。
"The nuclear industry in France - in common with the industry around the world - has no safe method for dealing with its nuclear waste," said Burnie.
至今沒有安全的方法處理核廢料
The report, "Nuclear Waste Management: the lessons from the CSM Disposal Site," is found at: http://www.acro.eu.org
法國蘇萊訥迪的核廢料棄置站未來60年都會繼續接收核廢料，綠色和平成員馬里耶指出，在廢料區附近的地下水中已驗出含有輻射因子氚，並透過空氣帶到大氣層中。「在地下水中竟含有核廢料釋出的輻射粒子，已證明廢料區不能安全處理核廢料。」。
我們要說的只有一句話：「眼前的專業知識比起日後的常識少得可憐！」或是套句哥白尼的話，那就是：「今天的科學是明天的迷信！」
Hanwen 2009/07/15于午夜夢迴
- 留言者: BaBooLoo
- Email: ztn@kiss99.com
- 網址:
- 日期: 2009-07-23 15:39:25
[版主回覆07/24/2009 07:19:47]呵呵，沒問題的啦，巴不路這麼關心他們，很快就是他們的朋友或家人.....。
- 留言者: nannan
- Email: br411107447912@yahoo.com.tw
- 網址:
- 日期: 2009-07-16 16:41:05
誰願有個放射性後院
[版主回覆07/16/2009 22:32:34]謝謝，而且因為一味的致力於建設與發展，台東已經失去優勢，已經享受不到其他縣市應有的便利與所謂文明，某個角度台東人甚至習慣了，是不是讓台東一直這樣，畢竟台灣剩下台東，您不會想到以後到有核廢料的地方散散心吧？何況台東市最沒有最慢享受一切方便的地方，理論上應該沒有機會拿到核廢料，更何況兩次機會都是台東.......謝謝您支持，希望您有台東的朋友幫忙告訴他們絕對不要讓核廢料進入家鄉，您有外地的朋友也幫忙請他們幫忙，說說話，告訴他們幫忙台灣保留一個台東吧！謝謝。感恩。
- 留言者: 玉米
- Email: gameyumin@gmail.com
- 網址:
- 日期: 2009-07-16 09:34:44
我也很反對，只是現在好像要強行公投，如果真的搞成公投，要怎麼對付？
不領票？或是領票以後投廢票？或者投反對票？
[版主回覆07/16/2009 22:28:50]
到時候情況其實現在不知道，只希望屆時大家團結一點，現在讓環保聯盟處理，到時候沒辦法，也請環保聯盟統一發號口令，看怎樣才會比較有效率比較有抵制力，要拒領，拒投或者投票反對，都必須有人發號施令，但只能單一窗口會比較有力量。您覺得呢？大家加油，大家團結。謝謝您。
沒有留言:
張貼留言